Many in our community have queried whether the new Sports and Aquatic Centre will have incorporated environmentally responsible design. In that regard the architects have designed the building to ensure that it is environmentally friendly.
Solar assisted hot water for showers has been included however pool heating has not.
Council investigated the possibility of solar assisted pool heating but ultimately it was considered inefficient and not cost effective. The incorporation of solar water heating would involve a high capital cost, detrimental increases in energy use to operate the system and fewer benefits. The Director of Assets and Facilities, Mr P Waite has pointed out that "the above conclusion is consistent with the approach taken on the newly constructed Cranbourne RACE which also does not provide pool heating via solar energy"
Council considered 3 types of solar heating:
- Tube Mat System - This is inefficent but low cost. These systems must use electricity to operate and are ideally used for domestic pools and municipal outdoor pools where only a small increase in temperature is required and the additional electricity cost is justified.
- Flat Plate Systems - These are mainly used for domestic applications in non-corrosive environments. Thet are certainly more efficient that Tube Mat Systems but due to the bature of pool water are inappropriate for use ina public pool.
- Evacuated Tube Systems - These are most efficient but particularly expensive. This type of system would cost approximately $360,000 to provide some heating to the outdoor 50m pool. Mr Waite has said that it is debatable whether there would be an actual "payback period" as typically these systems need replacing before there is return oninvestment.
In considering the issue of sustainability the focus has been on obtaining the best value for the limited budget.
Rather than going for feel good options Council has concentrated on outcomes that will deliver environmentally appropriate outcomes. These involve:
- Reducing the use of potable water by harvesting storm water, treating grey water for toilet flushing and irrigation and retaining and treating pool backwash water for irrigation;
- Conserving energy and reducing our carbon footprint through use of a heat transfer system between air conditioning exhaust and air supply ducts, solar assisted hot water for showers and basins, daylight sensors and special glazing for effective control of light, motorised baffles to western glazing, energy efficient ducted heating and cooling systems with natural bypass systems to minimise energy consumption when outside air temerature permits and an integrated Building Management System that effectively and continually monitors and controls plant and equipment.
The Community should be assured that Council was very much concerned to ensure that GESAC be built environmentally sustainable. Issues of sustainability are an ongoing issue and certainly as there are new developments they will be considered. As against this Council must also be financially responsible so where there are systems that are inefficient and expensive Council will continue to be prudent.

4 comments:
Dear Michael,
With all due respect I would like to suggest that sound environmental policy is not something warm and fuzzy and done to ‘feel good’. Similarly terms such as ‘environmentally friendly’ and ‘environmentally appropriate’ are rhetorically empty because they tell us nothing. There are laudable environmentally sound components of GESAC which even five years ago would not have been though about. But public awareness is now much higher and these days new infrastructure is expected to reach an 8 or even 10 star environmental rating. Do we know yet what rating GESAC will receive?
It is also problematic to consider that sustainability can be met through some sort of environment-financial trade-off. Cold hard scientific fact is telling us that continue to over exploit natural resources and pollute the atmosphere comes at the economic cost of potentially killing the planet off. I would hope we agree that is not a legacy that we wish to leave for future generations to contend with?
Next Thursday 6 at Glen Eira Town Hall is a public meeting on climate change, and I know that you have formally been invited to it. Along with Deputy Mayor Steven Tang, Professor David Karoly, one of the world’s leading climate scientists, will be speaking. I would urge you to come and hear what is being said because we all carry responsibility to do our bit in applying solutions, and particularly our elected leaders.
While we are on the environment question I would have to endorse the posting you made of few days ago on dog poo. It is a pity that a few irresponsible dog owners cause such problems. As a dog owner I often face the odious task of cleaning up someone else’s dog poo. The nearest park to me is Greenmeadows Park. Dogs are restricted to the northern end which makes complete sense and I agree with because the southern end has the childrens play ground and a picnic site. Why then has council placed the dog poo dispenser at the southern end, where dogs are not allowed?
Phillip
Let's just hope that Glen Eira doesn't go the same way as Cranbourne. Less than a week after opening this mega 37 million complex, it has been closed - shoddy workmanship apparently, as well as potential risks to the public!! It would also behove you Cr. Lipshutz to perform a Google search and carefully note how many public swimming pools, both within Australia and internationally are now solar heated. Your one example of Cranbourne palls into insignificance in light of all the contrary evidence.
Phillip and Jim have presented an alternative POV to Mr Peter Waite, Director of Assets and Facilities - but what was the range of his investigations, which eminent experts did he seek advice from?
I would have thought Council could make an application for a Grant for $500,000 to encourage a solar heating initiative outright. It must have had something going for it, if the Federal Government subsidize households and then ran out of money it was so popular.
Little to do with the money really Councillor, but everything to do with using the most effective sources at our disposal to protect the environment. It is time to get it right now! not live with regrets in ten years time.
Some modern technology shouldn't come with a price tag, but rather a conscience for the heritage we are leaving our children.
PS One year of freezing alterations to parks, reserves and gardens should see a saving of $500,000 easily. Don't install unnecessary concrete paths, don't demolish functioning toilets, drop off a Park Festival for one year, don't reef up shopping centre footpaths and there's the money saved already for this contingency in the budget!
Post a Comment